<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</subtitle>

    <updated>2025-03-31T12:59:22Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com" />
    <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.0647697036026722" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1501107/2020/08/cropped-favicon-32x32.png</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Dealing With Equitable Defenses]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/06/dealing-with-equitable-defenses/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46503</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:09:32Z</updated>
            <published>2020-06-05T21:08:42Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[June Landlord just called my office to ask about her case.  She told me that she had a Section 8 tenant who has lived in her apartment for 6 years.  Tom Tenant has 2 children and a run of bad luck.  Tom’s portion of the monthly rent is $300.00 and he is now behind three month’s rent and owes $900.00. …]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/06/dealing-with-equitable-defenses/"><![CDATA[June Landlord just called my office to ask about her case.  She told me that she had a Section 8 tenant who has lived in her apartment for 6 years.  Tom Tenant has 2 children and a run of bad luck.  Tom’s portion of the monthly rent is $300.00 and he is now behind three month’s rent and owes $900.00.  On top of this Tom Tenant now has a legal aid attorney who has filed papers with the court claiming a special defense.  Namely - Tom Tenant alleges that he can make the landlord whole, he has nowhere to go and that equity should prevent his loss of the apartment.  June wants to know what equity is and how it could possibly keep her from obtaining her apartment back?

Equity, while not a new legal defense, has become a common defense alleged by tenants.  In particular, the tenant often claims that unusual circumstances have intervened to make payment of rent on time and in full difficult or impossible.  Additionally, the tenant often claims that he will lose a valuable subsidy if evicted and that if he is permitted to stay the landlord will be reimbursed or made whole, in a relatively short period of time.  Lastly, the tenant often states that the loss to the landlord (meaning waiting for her money) is outweighed by the loss to the tenant (losing his housing and his subsidy) and that therefore the court should exercise its equitable powers and fashion a remedy to permit the tenant to remain in the premises, provided payment is made.

As the courts have dealt with these equitable defenses, the law of equity has evolved.  In particular, the courts have looked at a number of factors in weighing an equitable defense claim:  1.  The delay in payment to the landlord must have been slight and reasonable; 2.  The loss caused little or no damage to the landlord; 3.  The loss to the landlord was due to inadvertence or negligence and not gross or willful; 4.  If the court did not grant relief to the tenant it would result in such hardship to the tenant as to make it unconscionable to enforce literally the conditions of the lease; 5.  Whether in the absence of equitable relief, a party will suffer a loss wholly disproportionate to the injury to the other party; 6.  Whether the injury to the landlord is reparable (i.e. payment of money); 7.  The tenant seeking equity must have clean hands; 8.  The tenant must be in good faith in curing or attempting to cure the default or there is a good faith dispute over the meaning of a lease; and, 9.  If the tenant cannot make a full tender to the landlord of the arrearage, then there must be a good reason to believe that the landlord will be made whole with reasonable protection to the landlord.

In June’s case against Tom Tenant, she should be prepared to address each of the nine elements cited above in order to convince the court that the equities should weigh in her favor.  June needs to keep in mind, that, in order to assess and argue each of the elements discussed in this article, she will need to be sure to elicit evidence from Tom Tenant that is favorable to her case and impairs the defendant’s equity claim.  Also, June should be sure to put forth evidence before the court that can be used to tilt the scales of justice in  her favor.  For instance, June should testify about the fact that it has been three months since she received any rent and how it is making it hard to pay her bills and how the tenant has made no effort to make her whole in a prompt manner.  This type of evidence will help to show the court how the default has hurt June.

Obviously, when dealing with a complex defense, such as equity, it is a daunting task for any landlord representing herself before the court, and qualified legal counsel is always encouraged.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Dealing With The “Claim of Exemption”]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/05/dealing-with-the-claim-of-exemption/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46501</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:08:01Z</updated>
            <published>2020-05-05T21:06:54Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Jane Landlord had a tenant, named Joe Tenant who fell behind in his rent payments.  Jane decided she had no other choice but to commence eviction proceedings.  Following all the rules, Jane served a notice to quit and then served a writ summons and complaint on the Joe Tenant and returned her suit to court.  After attending a court ordered…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/05/dealing-with-the-claim-of-exemption/"><![CDATA[Jane Landlord had a tenant, named Joe Tenant who fell behind in his rent payments.  Jane decided she had no other choice but to commence eviction proceedings.  Following all the rules, Jane served a notice to quit and then served a writ summons and complaint on the Joe Tenant and returned her suit to court.  After attending a court ordered mediation session, the parties came to an agreement that Joe Tenant would move out by the last day of the month.  While not perfect, Jane goes home thinking all is well.  However, lurking in the shadows is a person Jane never heard about – “John Doe”.  Now John Doe files a piece of paper with the court called a “Claim of Exemption”, in which John alleges that he lived in the apartment with Joe Tenant and his occupancy started prior to service of the notice to quit on Joe Tenant.  Therefore, John Doe argues that the judgment against Joe Tenant does not apply to him and he cannot be evicted.  “SAY IT ISN’T SO”, cries Jane Landlord.

Jane calls a seasoned eviction attorney for advice and finds out the following information about so called “Claims of Exemption”:
<ol>
 	<li>A claim of exemption is a creature of statute.  Namely, C.G.S. §47a-26h(c) provides that “any occupant not named in the action…whose occupancy commenced prior to the notice to quit…may at any time before or after judgment, but prior to issuance of an execution… file under oath a claim of exemption from such action”.</li>
 	<li>The clerk of the court is required to schedule a hearing on said claim not more than seven days after such claim.</li>
 	<li>At the hearing John Doe will be required to prove that his occupancy took place prior to service of the notice to quit or that his occupancy was commenced or continued with the permission or consent of Jane Landlord.  Then, the burden of proof shall be on Jane Landlord to prove that she did not know of the presence of the occupant or the name of the occupant as the case may be.  If Jane Landlord accepted payments of rent from John Doe, then she is presumed to have known of the presence and the name of the occupant.</li>
 	<li>If the court finds the facts in favor of John Doe, then Jane Landlord will need to “fix” the problem.  If the court finds that John Doe is bound by the action, the judgment stands and execution may take place, removing Joe Tenant and John Doe.</li>
</ol>
After a long silence, Jane tells the attorney that she thought a guy was hanging around the apartment, but that she didn’t think he lived there.  Jane also mentions that when she was at the property a while back she noticed two names on the mailbox for Joe Tenant’s unit, but she thought nothing of it.  As she relates the facts to her attorney Jane realizes that she goofed up.  She should have added “John Doe” to her notice to quit and made him a party to the eviction.  Jane is upset… “Now what?” She asks the attorney.  “Do I have to start over?”

Like any good lawyer, the attorney tells Jane that all is not lost.  In fact, the statute provides that in a situation such as hers, where she should have served John Doe a notice to quit, she can do so now.  If John Doe is still there after the quit date, she can then serve John Doe with an amended writ, summons and complaint adding John Doe as a party defendant to the action.  Jane can then proceed against John Doe in the same manner as in the original eviction action.  Jane lost some time, but at least she won’t have to start over and pay for a new court entry fee.

Jane then asks the attorney for some advise so that she won’t get caught in a situation such as this again.  “Well” replied the attorney, “first, always do a little investigation as to who is in the unit.  Second, when you make a deal with the tenant at court, ask him if anyone lives with him.  If he says yes, ask him since when.  If the unknown person was there prior to the notice to quit, you know you may have a problem.  If he says no, put a statement in the agreement you submit to the judge which certifies that he is the only adult occupant in the unit or that the disclosed unknown occupant entered into possession after service of the notice to quit.”  “Lastly”, the attorney says, “when you have suspicions of other occupants, add ‘John Doe’ and ‘Jane Doe” to your notice to quit and allege that they never had the right or privilege to occupy the premises”.

Jane thanks the attorney for his help, thinking to herself “maybe hiring an attorney at the start is a smart move considering the complexity of eviction law in Connecticut!”

Always something to consider.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Landlord/Tenant: From Cradle (Application) to Grave (Eviction/Moveout)]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/04/landlord-tenant-from-cradle-application-to-grave-eviction-moveout/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46499</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:06:15Z</updated>
            <published>2020-04-05T21:05:12Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[As I sat at my desk thinking about an article for this publication, I began to ponder just what I have learned in 30 years as a lawyer.  Unfortunately, I soon discovered that the more you think you know, the more you need to learn!  Landlord Tenant law is always evolving and as landlords, and for me as a landlord…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/04/landlord-tenant-from-cradle-application-to-grave-eviction-moveout/"><![CDATA[As I sat at my desk thinking about an article for this publication, I began to ponder just what I have learned in 30 years as a lawyer.  Unfortunately, I soon discovered that the more you think you know, the more you need to learn!  Landlord Tenant law is always evolving and as landlords, and for me as a landlord lawyer, we need to stay on top of this evolution.

Hence, my thoughts have led me to look at the big picture that landlord’s should be aware of.  <u>First</u>, you must thoroughly vet, meaning screen your applicants.  Still today, after hearing so many horror stories, I have landlords come to me with no background paperwork on their tenants.  Please obtain a complete application from every occupant.  Then check their information out.  Credit reports, backgrounds check, landlord references etc.  You will save yourself a lot of heartache someday😊  <u>Second</u>, only accept bank checks, money orders or cash for the initial move in payments and security deposits.  Do not hand over keys without good funds in hand.  If they don’t have the money, you should rethink your decision to rent to them.  <u>Third</u>, do not barter or negotiate with the tenant to make the premises rentable.  This inevitably leads to issues about value, payment, liability etc.  It is your property, make it tenant ready and have the tenant acknowledge that they have inspected it and agree that the premises are in good condition.  <u>Fourth</u>, use a written lease.  Whether it is a weekly rental or a one-year lease, it allows you to memorialize the agreement, as well as, the rules, regulations and financial terms. <u>Fifth</u>, follow up with the tenant after move in. Tenants should know you are an attentive and serious landlord who cares about her property and the people living there.  Perform routine and regular unit inspections. As part of the tenant occupancy, keep a log for each unit you rent and document communications, whether they are by phone, in person, letter, email or text.  This consistent business practice will serve you well should you ever end up in litigation.  <u>Sixth</u>, enforce the terms of the lease and your rules consistently and timely.  Landlord’s who become “soft” or want to “help” tenants will ultimately find that nice guys don in fact finish last and you should not turn your real estate business into a charity.  <u>Seventh</u>, stay up to date on the law!  Your landlord group and your fellow landlords are dealing with law changes on a regular basis.  Attend seminars and become educated.  I am seeing many instances where the landlord is acting in good faith but losing cases because they have not followed the law.  I urge you to re-read the bedbug statute for an example of a law that many landlords still do not understand or follow.  <u>Eighth</u>, make sure you work with a lawyer who is experienced in landlord/tenant law.  When it comes time to end a relationship with a tenant through eviction, you can’t afford mistakes.  More summary process cases (evictions) are dismissed by the court than any other cases, simply because of technicalities.  <u>Ninth</u>, keep your documents in an organized fashion so you are ready when they are needed as evidence during an eviction or collection proceeding or as proof as to security deposit accounting.  I also always encourage my clients to take before and after pictures of every move in/move out and save them in a tenant folder for future use.  <u>Tenth</u>, and finally, ask for guidance from your professionals.  In addition to belonging to trade organizations such as CCOPO, you should have a team of professionals to draw from when you are a landlord. Every landlord should have a tax accountant, landlord and real estate attorney and commercial insurance broker on board to assist and guide them.

I encourage every landlord, <u>be a mentor</u> to a new landlord and if you don’t have a mentor yet, <u>ask someone you respect to mentor you</u>.  The benefits, both professionally and personally will last a lifetime.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Fair Housing Advertising]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/03/fair-housing-advertising/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46497</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:04:35Z</updated>
            <published>2020-03-05T22:03:41Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Section 804(c) of the Fair Housing Act states in relevant part that it is “unlawful to make, print or publish, or cause to be made, printed, or published, any notice, statement, or advertisement, with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling, that indicated any preference, limitation, or discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/03/fair-housing-advertising/"><![CDATA[Section 804(c) of the Fair Housing Act states in relevant part that it is “unlawful to make, print or publish, or cause to be made, printed, or published, any notice, statement, or advertisement, with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling, that indicated any preference, limitation, or discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention to make any such preference, limitation, or discrimination.”

In addition, Connecticut expands the protected classes to also include: ancestry, marital status, age (except minors), sexual orientation, source of income, gender identity or expression.

Federal and state totals thirteen categories!

How do we know if we are using discriminatory words, phrases, symbols or visual aids?  In today’s world, the line continues to be blurred to the extent that it is becoming incredibly difficult to create advertising which differentiates one property or landlord from another.

Let’s use a sample ad:  For Rent, 3-bedroom home, historic charm, built in 1800’s, large master bedroom, open level yard for entertaining.  Safe, family neighborhood, only a short walk to the park and Catholic Church.  House is ready now, move in before Easter!

How about pictures for your ads?  Are you using symbols which may create the intention to make a preference, limitation or discrimination?  Use care when using pictures to avoid the problems.  For example, how does it look when you have a picture in front of the house with the mom, dad, two kids and the golden retriever in the yard?  How about the picture of the house with the cross by the front door or the Christmas decorations?

My review leads me back to a simple proposition… describe the rental, not what is the ideal renter.

For example, don’t say “perfect for a couple” or “great for a single professional” … again, who is the property describing?  How about “handyman special” does this imply that a person with a disability should not be interested because they can’t personally climb on the roof to make repairs?

On a side note, publishing in traditional media has a slight layer of protection because the publisher can be dragged into the fray or discrimination even if they run the ad you created.  But, beware, the internet publisher has a different set of rules for content posted by third parties so they may be more lax when you run afoul of the discriminatory advertising rules.

Conclusion: Be cautious!  Parse through every aspect of your proposed ads to avoid the word, symbol or phrase that will get you in HOT WATER.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Marriage?  A New Way of Looking at the Landlord-Tenant Relationship]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/02/marriage-a-new-way-of-looking-at-the-landlord-tenant-relationship/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46495</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:03:07Z</updated>
            <published>2020-02-05T22:01:47Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When I first became a lawyer, I was convinced that my education and newly acquired legal skills would make me a formidable opponent in the courtroom.  Emboldened by my Juris Doctorate, I was ready to take on the legal community.  However, before I had my first trial, my non-lawyer father had a piece of advice for me – he said…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/02/marriage-a-new-way-of-looking-at-the-landlord-tenant-relationship/"><![CDATA[When I first became a lawyer, I was convinced that my education and newly acquired legal skills would make me a formidable opponent in the courtroom.  Emboldened by my Juris Doctorate, I was ready to take on the legal community.  However, before I had my first trial, my non-lawyer father had a piece of advice for me – he said “son, don’t be offended, but lawyers don’t win lawsuits, paperwork wins”.  I wasn’t offended, but like all children, I didn’t immediately buy into his theory.

After twenty nine years in the Housing Courts throughout Connecticut, I must say that my father’s advice still rings true.  I only wish more of my landlords would ascribe to it.  Looking back over time, I am convinced that effective landlording requires following my dad’s advice.  A landlord tenant relationship is a lot like a dating relationship.  First it starts with a courtship (advertising and applying).  In this case, instead of sending out a “vibe” letting the tenant know you are interested in starting a new relationship (lease), the landlord simply advertises.  Tenants picking up on the vibe (advertisement) seize the opportunity to make a good impression (apply) in order to enter into that new relationship.  We are now in the courtship stage, where the landlord and tenant is each trying to impress the other.  Just like a courtship, landlords must be wary of this new suitor.  This requires the landlord to take every step to make sure they are not going to get married (lease) to the wrong person.

As we know, relationships built on deceit are doomed to fail.  Landlords must perform a full screening of the tenant.  Always be wary of a tenant who fails to fill in every section of the application or has gaps in the application.  Check each source and ask to review original identification.  It always amazes me when I see incomplete applications, or landlord’s who have failed to perform any screening, show surprise when the tenant turns out to be a “bad tenant”.  Proper screening requires review of credit history, past landlords (always go back at least two prior landlords) and an eviction search.  Anything short of this would be like handing the keys to your henhouse to a fox and hoping it is a vegetarian.  Similarly, finding out you are married (leased) to a convicted felon, or tax cheat will make for a bad marriage (tenancy).

At the end of the courtship, landlords and tenants move into their serious relationship (lease).  From this point on, they are “married”.  Marriage has been defined to be a contract between two people.  Sounds familiar, right?  This formal landlord/tenant relationship will have ups and downs like any other relationship.  Maintaining a good relationship in a marriage, as in a tenancy, requires “communication”.  Communication is a two way street, meaning both parties have to speak and be heard.  However, the spoken word is often lost in translation, and to protect you from the proverbial “he said, she said” scenario in the future, landlords must create a physical paper trail which can assist the marriage counselor (housing specialist) or judge in deciding who is right and who is wrong.  Over the course of my career covering over ten thousand evictions, time and time again I have clients come to their divorce hearing, I mean eviction case, without any documentation or paperwork to support their claims.  I ask you, what is a judge to do?  The simple answer is – pick the party they believe is telling the truth, while at the same time giving the tenant the benefit of the doubt since they are the ones who get kicked out of the house.  Now, if we give the judge a choice, she will take the paper trail more often than not because it has the tendency to be true because the documents are created contemporaneously with the event.

We also know that the cost of divorce (evictions) is high and with divorces (evictions) as common as they are, we should always be equipped to enter the legal arena prepared to win.  My dad was right and I now know it from years of experience – paperwork wins cases.  Build your case from day one by creating paperwork which documents your relationship and memorializes the evidence you may one day need to win your case.  A client of mine once placed the following quote on all paper in his office (e.g. note pads, phone logs, invoices, work orders etc.)  “Write It - Don’t Say It!”.  Litigating cases for him became a lot easier thanks to that wise edict.

In conclusion, think about your potential new tenant as a potential new spouse.  Would you willingly give half of everything you own to a spouse without really knowing everything there is to know about him/her?  Would you lend thousands of dollars to a stranger off the street without really getting to know him/her?  Then why would any thoughtful landlord marry a tenant without taking every precaution prior to entering into the sacred contract of marriage? Knowing history, why would you leave it to a “he said – she said” situation, when statistically you will most likely someday be in court fighting over your failed relationship?  My lesson for landlords - screening your suitor and documenting your relationship is like a well designed prenuptial agreement, making the divorce which you may have to go through less frustrating, costly and time consuming.]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Law Offices of Michael H. Clinton, LLC</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Going Buggy! Unfortunately, Landlords Are Still Unfamiliar with Bed Bug Infestation Statute]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/01/going-buggy-unfortunately-landlords-are-still-unfamiliar-with-bed-bug-infestation-statute/" />
            <id>https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/?p=46493</id>
            <updated>2020-10-05T21:00:52Z</updated>
            <published>2020-01-05T21:59:39Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[On May 26, 2016 our state legislature enacted House Bill Number 5335, Public Act Number 16–51 entitled, “An Act concerning the Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Regarding the Treatment of Bedbug Infestations”.  Since then, the Act has been codified as Connecticut General Statutes section 47a-7a (I have attached a copy for the reader’s consideration).  I affectionately call it…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.clintonlawoffices.com/blog/2020/01/going-buggy-unfortunately-landlords-are-still-unfamiliar-with-bed-bug-infestation-statute/"><![CDATA[On May 26, 2016 our state legislature enacted House Bill Number 5335, Public Act Number 16–51 entitled, “An Act concerning the Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Regarding the Treatment of Bedbug Infestations”.  Since then, the Act has been codified as Connecticut General Statutes section 47a-7a (I have attached a copy for the reader’s consideration).  I affectionately call it the “Bed Bug Statute”.

Incredibly, three years after its enactment, many landlords are still not familiar with the Bed Bug Statute and how it works. I receive numerous calls throughout the year indicating that tenants are uncooperative or failed to prepare for bedbug treatments. In fact, many landlord’s express frustration because when one tenant is uncooperative, the problem continues to spread throughout their buildings.  This is where the Bed Bug Statute can come in handy. While I will not address every provision of the Statute in this article, I do want to touch upon some of the important portions and how landlords should address them when dealing with a bedbug problem.

While the statute requires the tenant to promptly notify their landlord orally or in writing when the tenant knows or suspects of the bedbug problem, often the landlord finds out about the problem from a neighbor, during a routine inspection, or in some other informal fashion (e.g. after a notice to quit is filed, surprising right?), many times, the tenant is not the notifying party.  In my view, how the landlord finds out is not important, just that the landlord has notice. In any event, once a landlord hears about the problem, most landlords will inspect the premises and then commence treatment if a problem is found. However, the Bed Bug Statute requires a landlord to provide notice to the tenant within two days of inspection indicating whether or not that bugs have been found to be present. This notice requires the landlord to indicate whether or not the unit is infested with bed bugs and inform the tenant that if the tenant is still concerned that the unit is infested with bedbugs, that the tenant may contact the local health department and the landlord shall provide relevant contact information on said notice. To date, I have not received any information from a client that they provided this notice and in particular, the contact information for the city. In addition to the notice, if the unit inspection determines that there are bedbugs, the landlord shall treat the bedbug infestation within five days. The statute goes on to indicate that the landlord “shall be responsible for all costs associated with inspection for and treatment of bedbug infestation.” Obviously, many clients become upset knowing that they have to pay for these treatments when the condition is caused by tenants. Unfortunately, when an outbreak occurs, it is difficult if not impossible, to identify the cause of the outbreak.

Another issue which landlords find of concern is the inability to enter the premises because of an uncooperative tenant, and/or the tenant is not prepared properly for the bedbug treatment, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the pest control procedures. The Bed Bug Statute does contemplate this scenario and states that a tenant must “comply with reasonable measures to permit the inspection and treatment of the bedbug infestation… And such tenant shall be responsible for all costs associated with preparing a dwelling unit for such inspection and treatment. The tenants knowing and unreasonable failure to comply with such bedbug inspection and treatment measures shall result in the tenant being held liable for those bed bug treatments of the dwelling unit and  contiguous units arising from such failure.” Landlords should be cognizant of their obligation to offer to make reasonable assistance available to any tenant who is <em>not physically able</em> to comply with the preparation for any bed bug inspection or treatment measures that are the tenant’s responsibility. As a matter of good business practice, this obligation should be conveyed to the tenant, in writing, as the language of the statute uses the term “shall offer” but does not indicate in what form. Prudence leads me to conclude that this offer should be in writing. There are additional requirements for the notice, including disclosing the cost of providing the assistance and the landlord may, at their discretion, charge the tenant a reasonable amount for such assistance, provided such charge is subject to a reasonable repayment schedule not to exceed six months, unless the landlord and tenant agree to one or more extensions of such repayment schedule. Note, failure to repay the charges does not relieve the landlord of the duty to treat the unit, nor does it give the landlord the right to terminate the lease for nonpayment. Rather, should payment not be made under this agreed provision, the landlord may deduct such sums from the tenant security deposit in accordance with C.G.S. 47a-21.

Finally, landlords who encounter obstinate tenants who are unwilling to comply with reasonable requests for entry, inspections, preparation and/or treatments can rely upon subsection (2) of the Bed Bug Statute to apply to the Superior Court to obtain injunctive relief. Many landlords are not familiar with the procedures permitting injunctive relief under C.G. S. §47a-18, but essentially the process allows an expedited hearing in which the tenant must show cause as to why an injunction should not issue, thereby permitting the landlord to address the bedbug problem. The statute goes on to provide the measures of relief that a landlord may request.  This procedure requires service of a Verified Complaint (meaning sworn to by the plaintiff) and service of the Verified Complaint and a Show Cause Order with an application for injunctive relief with the court.

<strong>Conclusion / Practice Tip:  </strong>Landlords should be aware that the strongest cases are founded upon great paperwork. Landlords should be conscious of the obligation to provide notices as set forth in statute and should document in writing the outcomes of the investigations for bedbugs in the notices provided in order to permit the tenants to contest the findings as set forth in the statute. Further, all pest control records should be kept available should the landlord need to avail herself of the injunctive relief set forth in the statute.  <strong>As always, I recommend that you have an experienced and qualified attorney to help you with your problem tenants and to protect you from documentation and notice mistakes that can cost you money and delay your bedbug eradication procedures or to file your Verified Complaint and Injunctive Relief Orders.  Happy New Year and, may 2020 bring you good tenants, good health, lots of success and much happiness!</strong>

<strong>Here is a copy of the Bed Bug Statute:</strong>

<u>Sec. 47a-7a. Landlord and tenant responsibilities re bed bug infestations. Definitions. Notification to landlord. Inspection. Treatment. Liability of landlord. Injunction against tenant.</u> (a) As used in this section:

(1) “Certified applicator” means an individual who is certified, in accordance with section 22a-54, by the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection to perform application within this state of a pesticide or class of pesticides;

(2) “Bed bug” means the common bed bug (Cimex lectularius);

(3) “Bed bug detection team” means a scent detection canine team that holds a current, independent, third-party certification in accordance with the guidelines for Minimum Standards for Canine Bed Bug Detection Team Certification established by the National Pest Management Association;

(4) “Landlord”, “owner”, “person” and “tenant” have the same meanings as in section 47a-1;

(5) “Qualified inspector” means a certified applicator, local health department official or bed bug detection team retained by a landlord to conduct an inspection for an infestation of bed bugs;

(6) “Pest control agent” means a person who is a certified applicator or who is otherwise specially licensed or qualified to treat bed bug infestations; and

(7) “Dwelling unit” means a unit other than a single-family unattached unit that is occupied as a home or residence for one or more persons.

(b) (1) A tenant shall promptly notify a landlord orally or in writing when the tenant knows or reasonably suspects that the tenant's dwelling unit is infested with bed bugs. Not later than five business days after receiving such notice, the landlord shall inspect or obtain an inspection by a qualified inspector of the dwelling unit and any contiguous unit of which the landlord is an owner, lessor or sublessor, and may enter any such dwelling unit or contiguous unit for the purpose of conducting such inspection as provided in subparagraph (A) of subdivision (2) of this subsection. If the landlord conducts the inspection, the landlord must provide written notice to the tenant within two days indicating whether or not the unit is infested with bed bugs. The notice shall inform the tenant that, if the tenant is still concerned that the unit is infested with bed bugs, the tenant may contact the local health department and shall provide relevant contact information on said notice. If the inspection determines that any such dwelling unit or contiguous unit is infested with bed bugs, the landlord shall, not later than five business days after the date of the inspection, take reasonable measures, as determined by such qualified inspector, to effectively treat the bed bug infestation, including treating or retaining the services of a pest control agent to treat the dwelling unit and any contiguous unit of which the landlord is an owner, lessor or sublessor, except the landlord may first attempt to effectively treat such infestation. If the landlord treats such bed bug infestation without retaining the services of a pest control agent, the landlord shall first vacuum the areas to be treated and shall, not later than five business days after the date of such treatment, obtain an inspection of any treated unit by a qualified inspector. If the qualified inspector determines that any such unit is not infested with bed bugs, the qualified inspector shall provide the landlord with a written certification of such determination. If the qualified inspector determines that any such unit is infested with bed bugs, the landlord shall, not later than five business days after the date of such inspection, retain the services of a pest control agent. Except as otherwise provided in this section, the landlord shall be responsible for all costs associated with inspection for and treatment of a bed bug infestation. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude a tenant from contacting any agency at any time concerning an infestation of bed bugs.

(2) (A) Upon reasonable written or oral notice to a tenant in accordance with the provisions of section 47a-16 that a landlord, qualified inspector or pest control agent must enter a dwelling unit for the purpose of conducting an inspection for, or treating an infestation of, bed bugs, a tenant shall not unreasonably withhold access to the dwelling unit. Any entry to a dwelling unit shall be made in accordance with the provisions of section 47a-16.

(B) The landlord or qualified inspector may initially conduct a visual and manual inspection of the tenant's bedding and upholstered furniture. The landlord or qualified inspector may inspect items other than bedding and upholstered furniture when such landlord or qualified inspector determines that such an inspection is necessary and reasonable. If the landlord or qualified inspector finds bed bugs in the dwelling unit or in any contiguous unit of which the landlord is an owner, lessor or sublessor, such landlord or qualified inspector may have such additional access to the tenant's personal belongings as the landlord or qualified inspector determines is necessary and reasonable. A tenant shall comply with reasonable measures to permit the inspection and treatment of a bed bug infestation as determined by the landlord and qualified inspector or pest control agent, and such tenant shall be responsible for all costs associated with preparing a dwelling unit for such inspection and treatment. The tenant's knowing and unreasonable failure to comply with such bed bug inspection and treatment measures shall result in the tenant being held liable for those bed bug treatments of the dwelling unit and contiguous units arising from such failure.

(C) Whenever any furniture, clothing, equipment or personal property belonging to a tenant is found to be infested with bed bugs, such furniture, clothing, equipment or personal property shall not be removed from the dwelling unit until a pest control agent determines that a bed bug treatment has been completed, or until the landlord approves of such removal.

(3) (A) A landlord shall offer to make reasonable assistance available to a tenant who is not physically able to comply with preparation for any bed bug inspection or treatment measures that are the tenant's responsibility under this section. The landlord shall disclose to the tenant the cost, if any, of providing such assistance to the tenant. The landlord may, at the landlord's discretion, charge the tenant a reasonable amount for any such assistance, provided such charge is subject to a reasonable repayment schedule not to exceed six months, unless the landlord and tenant agree to one or more extensions of such repayment schedule. A tenant's failure to agree to any such charges or repayment schedule shall not relieve the landlord of the duty to treat the dwelling unit.

(B) A tenant's failure to make any payment required pursuant to a repayment schedule shall not be the basis for a summary process action initiated pursuant to chapter 832. At the termination of a tenancy, a landlord may deduct any remaining payments owed under a repayment schedule from a security deposit in accordance with the provisions of section 47a-21.

(C) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a landlord to provide a tenant with alternative lodging or to pay to replace the tenant's personal property. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preempt or restrict application of the provisions of chapter 814c or any other state or federal law concerning reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities.

(c) No landlord shall offer for rent a dwelling unit that the landlord knows or reasonably suspects is infested with bed bugs. Before renting a dwelling unit, a landlord shall disclose to a prospective tenant whether the unit the landlord is offering for rent or any contiguous unit of which the landlord is an owner, lessor or sublessor is currently infested with bed bugs. Upon request from a tenant or prospective tenant, a landlord shall disclose the last date on which the dwelling unit being rented or offered for rent was inspected for, and found to be free of, a bed bug infestation.

(d) (1) If any landlord fails to comply with the provisions of this section, then any tenant may proceed as provided in section 47a-12 or section 47a-14h. Any landlord who fails to comply with the provisions of this section shall be liable to the tenant for reasonable attorneys' fees and the greater of two hundred fifty dollars or the tenant's actual damages.

(2) A landlord may apply to the Superior Court to obtain injunctive relief in accordance with section 47a-18 and to obtain such other relief as may be appropriate against a tenant who (A) refuses to provide reasonable access to a dwelling unit, (B) fails to comply with reasonable requests for inspection or treatment of a dwelling unit, or (C) fails to implement reasonable inspection and treatment measures required pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. The entry fee for such an action shall be the same as the entry fee for a small claims case. If a court finds that a tenant has unreasonably failed to comply with this section, the court may issue a temporary order or interim relief to carry out the provisions of this section, including, but not limited to: (i) Granting the landlord access to the dwelling unit for the purposes set forth in this section; (ii) granting the landlord the right to engage in bed bug inspection and treatment measures; and (iii) requiring the tenant to comply with specific bed bug inspection and treatment measures or assessing the tenant with costs and damages related to the tenant's noncompliance. Any order granting a landlord access to a dwelling unit shall be served upon the tenant at least twenty-four hours before a landlord, qualified inspector or pest control agent enters the dwelling unit.

(3) The remedies in this section shall be in addition to any other remedies available at law, or in equity, to any person. This section shall not be construed to limit or restrict the authority of any state or local housing or health code enforcement agency.

(P.A. 16-51, S. 1.)]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>